|
Author &
Title
|
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ABORTION |
|
|
|
|
| David Ozmun, Abortion
and Harm to Children: Limits on Television Political Advertisements |
1
|
1
|
99
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Ashley Packard,
Threats or Theater: Does Planned Parenthood v. American
Coalition of Life Activists Signify that Tests for
"True Threats" Need to Change? |
5
|
2
|
235
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ACCESS
TO MEDIA |
|
|
|
|
| Margaret A. Blanchard,
Reclaiming Freedom of the Press: A Hutchins Commission
Dream or Nightmare? |
3
|
3
|
371
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Timothy W. Gleason,
Saving Journalism from Itself (and from Us): The Hutchins
Commission Was Right Then, So What About Now? |
3
|
3
|
409
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ACTUAL
MALICE RULE |
|
|
|
|
| W. Wat Hopkins,
Justice Brennan, Justice Harlan and New York Times
v. Sullivan: A Case Study in Supreme Court Decision
Making |
1
|
4
|
469
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Thomas A. Hughes,
The Actual Malice Rule: Why Canada Rejected the American
Approach to Libel |
3
|
1
|
55
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ADVERTISING |
|
|
|
|
| David Ozmun, Abortion
and Harm to Children: Limits on Television Political Advertisements |
1
|
1
|
99
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| R. Michael Hoefges,
The Use of State Crime and Accident Records for Targeted,
Direct-Mail Solicitations: Commercial Speech, Access and
Privacy |
3
|
2
|
331
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Shannon Martin
and Kathleen Hansen, Examining the "Virtual"
Publication as a "Newspaper of Record" |
1
|
4
|
579
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Jan H. Samoriski,
Private Spaces and Public Interests: Internet Navigation,
Commercialism and the Fleecing of Democracy |
5
|
1
|
93
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS |
|
|
|
|
| Michael Perkins,
International Human Rights and the Collegiation of Journalists:
The Case of Costa Rica |
4
|
1
|
59
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ARGENTINA |
|
|
|
|
| Susana N. Vittadini
Andres, First Amendment Influence in Argentine Republic
Law and Jurisprudence |
4
|
2
|
149
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ARKANSAS
EDUC. TELEVISION V. FORBES |
|
|
|
|
| Karl H. Schmid,
Public Broadcasting Stations' Exclusion of Candidates
from Public Debates: A Step Toward Political Independence |
5
|
1
|
115
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ARMSTRONG,
SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
| Brett Parnes, Freedom
of Information Versus the National Security Council: Obscuring
the Focus of the "Sole-Function" Test |
4
|
3
|
355
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
| Andrew R. Bechtel
and Arati R. Korwar, Copyright and the Creative Use of
Visual Artworks in the 1990s |
4
|
4
|
431
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ASSOCIATION,
RIGHT OF |
|
|
|
|
| Mark Sableman,
Link Law: The Emerging Law of Internet Hyperlinks |
4
|
4
|
557
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ATTORNEYS |
|
|
|
|
| Ronald D. Rotunda,
Reporting Sensational Trials: Free Press, a Responsible
Press and Cameras in the Courts |
3
|
2
|
295
|
|
|
| Author
& Title |
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
| |
|
|
|
| AUDIENCE |
|
|
|
| Randall P. Bezanson,
The Atomization of the Newspaper: Technology, Economics
and the Coming Transformations of Editorial Judgment About
News |
3
|
2
|
175
|
| |
|
|
|
| William J. Brown
et al., Media Coverage and Public Opinion of the O.J.
Simpson Trial: Implications for the Criminal Justice System |
2
|
2
|
261
|
| |
|
|
|
| John W. Wright
II and Susan Dente Ross, Trial by Media? Media Reliance,
Knowledge of Crime and Perception of Criminal Defendants |
2
|
4
|
397
|
| |
|
|
|
| BISEXUAL
EXPRESSION |
|
|
|
| David S. Allen,
Merging Law and Ethics: Discourse Legal Theory and Freedom
of Expression in Hurley |
4
|
4
|
403
|
| |
|
|
|
| BOLLINGER,
LEE |
|
|
|
| Kaarle Nordenstreng,
Hutchins Goes Global |
3
|
3
|
419
|
| |
|
|
|
| BRAZIL |
|
|
|
| Patricia Aufderheide,
In Search of the Civic Sector: Cable Television Policy
Making in Brazil, 1989-1996 |
2
|
4
|
563
|
| |
|
|
|
| BRENNAN,
WILLIAM |
|
|
|
| W. Wat Hopkins,
Justice Brennan, Justice Harlan and New York Times
v. Sullivan: A Case Study in Supreme Court Decision
Making |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| BROADCASTING |
|
|
|
| Howard Kleiman,
Government-Operated Public Broadcast Stations and Candidates'
Access to Political Debates |
1
|
2
|
299
|
| |
|
|
|
| Dale Kunkel and
Ursula Goette, Broadcasters' Response to the Children's
Television Act |
2
|
3
|
289
|
| |
|
|
|
| Philip M. Napoli,
The Federal Communications Commission and Broadcast Policy-Making--1966-95:
A Logistic Regression Analysis of Interest Group Influence |
5
|
2
|
203
|
| |
|
|
|
| David Ozmun, Abortion
and Harm to Children: Limits on Television Political Advertisements |
1
|
1
|
99
|
| |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part I: Its Origins in State and
Federal Regulation |
2
|
3
|
309
|
| |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part II: Its Implementation in
Early Broadcast Law and Regulation |
2
|
4
|
363
|
| |
|
|
|
| Joseph A. Russomanno,
Workplace Freedom of Expression: A Case for the Broadcast
News Employee |
1
|
1
|
1
|
| |
|
|
|
| Karl H. Schmid,
Public Broadcasting Stations' Exclusion of Candidates
from Public Debates: A Step Toward Political Independence? |
5
|
1
|
115
|
| |
|
|
|
| John L. Sullivan
and Amy B. Jordan, Playing By the Rules: Impact and Implementation
of Children's Educational Television Regulations Among
Local Broadcasters |
4
|
4
|
483
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hao Xiaming, Party
Dominance vs. Cultural Imperialism: China's Strategies
to Regulate Satellite Broadcasting |
5
|
2
|
155
|
| |
|
|
|
| BUDDHISM |
|
|
|
| Betty H. Winfield
et al., Confucianism, Collectivism and Constitutions:
Press Systems in China and Japan |
5
|
3
|
323
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
