|
Author &
Title
|
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CABLE
TELEVISION |
|
|
|
|
| David J. Atkin,
Video Dialtone Reconsidered: Prospects for Competition
in the Wake of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 |
4
|
1
|
35
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Patricia Aufderheide,
In Search of the Civic Sector: Cable Television Policy
Making in Brazil, 1989-96 |
2
|
4
|
563
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Heather E. Campbell
and Marianne Barrett, Cable Television and Telephony in
the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Economics, Law, Regulation
and Politics |
2
|
4
|
477
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Amit Schejter,
From a Tool for National Cohesion to a Manifestation of
National Conflict: The Evolution of Cable Television Policy
in Israel, 1986-98 |
4
|
2
|
177
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Laura Stein, Can
the First Amendment Protect Public Space on U.S. Media
Systems? The Case of Public Access Television |
5
|
3
|
349
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CAMERAS |
|
|
|
|
| Rodney A. Smolla,
From Paparazzi to Hideen Cameras: The Hidden Side of a
Free and Responsible Press |
3
|
2
|
315
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CAMERAS
IN THE COURTS |
|
|
|
|
| Ronald D. Rotunda,
Reporting Sensational Trials: Free Press, a Responsible
Press and Cameras in the Courts |
3
|
2
|
295
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CANADA |
|
|
|
|
| Jack Glascock,
Regina v. Butler: The Harms Approach and Freedom
of Expression |
1
|
1
|
117
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Thomas A. Hughes,
The Actual Malice Rule: Why Canada Rejected the American
Approach to Libel |
3
|
1
|
55
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Roy Leeper, Keegstra
and R.A.V.: A Comparative Analysis of the Canadian
and U.S. Approaches to Hate Speech Legislation |
5
|
3
|
295
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CAPITAL
PUNISHMENT |
|
|
|
|
| Marla Sandys and
Steven M. Chermak, A Journey into the Unknown: Pretrial
Publicity and Capital Cases |
1
|
4
|
533
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CENSORSHIP |
|
|
|
|
| Randall S. Sumpter,
"Censorship Liberally Administered": Press,
U.S. Military Relations in the Spanish-American War |
4
|
4
|
463
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CHILDREN'S
TELEVISION |
|
|
|
|
| Dale Kunkel and
Ursula Goette, Broadcasters' Response to the Children's
Television Act |
2
|
3
|
289
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| David Ozmun, Abortion
and Harm to Children: Limits on Television Political Advertisements |
1
|
1
|
99
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| John L. Sullivan
and Amy B. Jordan, Playing By the Rules: Impact and Implementation
of Children's Educational Television Regulations Among
Local Broadcasters |
4
|
4
|
483
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CHILDREN'S
TELEVISION ACT OF 1990 |
|
|
|
|
| Dale Kunkel and
Ursula Goette, Broadcasters' Response to the Children's
Television Act |
2
|
3
|
289
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| John L. Sullivan
and Amy B. Jordan, Playing By the Rules: Impact and Implementation
of Children's Educational Television Regulations Among
Local Broadcasters |
4
|
4
|
483
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| CHINA |
|
|
|
|
| Krishna P. Jayakar,
The United States-China Copyright Dispute: A Two-Level
Games Analysis |
2
|
4
|
527
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Betty H. Winfield
et al., Confucianism, Collectivism and Constitutions:
Press Systems in China and Japan |
5
|
3
|
323
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Hao Xiaoming, Party
Dominace vs. Cultural Imperialism: China's Strategies
to Regulate Satellite Broadcasting |
5
|
2
|
155
|
|
|
| Author
& Title |
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
| |
|
|
|
| COHEN
V. COWLES MEDIA |
|
|
|
| Morgan David Arant,
Jr., Promises to Keep: Enforcement of Prepbulication Agreements
and First Amendment Rights |
1
|
3
|
397
|
| |
|
|
|
| Matthew D. Bunker
et al., Triggering the First Amendment: Newsgathering
Torts and Press Freedom |
4
|
3
|
325
|
| |
|
|
|
| COLEGIO
OF JOURNALISTS |
|
|
|
| Michael Perkins,
International Human Rights and the Collegiation of Journalists:
The Case of Costa Rica |
4
|
1
|
59
|
| |
|
|
|
| COLLECTIVISM |
|
|
|
| Betty H. Winfield
et al., Confucianism, Collectivism and Constitutions:
Press Systems in China and Japan |
5
|
3
|
323
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMERCIAL
SPEECH |
|
|
|
| R. Michael Hoefges,
The Use of State Crime and Accident Records for Targeted,
Direct-Mail Solicitations: Commercial Speech, Access and
Privacy |
3
|
2
|
331
|
| |
|
|
|
| Jan H. Samoriski,
Private Spaces and Public Interests: Internet Navigation,
Commercialism and the Fleecing of Democracy |
5
|
1
|
93
|
| |
|
|
|
COMMISSION
ON FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
(See
Hutchins Commission) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMON
CARRIAGE |
|
|
|
| Heather E. Campbell
and Marianne Barrett, Cable Television and Telephony in
the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Economics, Law, Regulation
and Politics |
2
|
4
|
477
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMUNICATION
LAW |
|
|
|
| Marouf Hasian,
Jr., Communication Law as a Rhetorical Practices: A Case
Study of the Masses Decision |
1
|
4
|
497
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMUNICATION
POLICY |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part I: Its Origins in State and
Federal Regulation |
2
|
3
|
309
|
| |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part II: Its Implementation in
Early Broadcast Law and Regulation |
2
|
4
|
363
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hao Xiaoming, Party
Dominance vs. Cultural Imperialism: China's Strategies
to Regulate Satellite Broadcasting |
5
|
2
|
155
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMUNICATION
ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Howard Kleiman,
Government-Operated Public Broadcast Stations and Candidates'
Access to Political Debates |
1
|
2
|
299
|
| |
|
|
|
| David Ozmun, Abortion
and Harm to Children: Limits on Television Political Advertisements |
1
|
1
|
99
|
| |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part I: Its Origins in State and
Federal Regulation |
2
|
3
|
309
|
| |
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland,
Jr., The Meaning of "The Public Interest" in
Communications Policy, Part II: Its Implementation in
Early Broadcast Law and Regulation |
2
|
4
|
363
|
| |
|
|
|
| COMMUNITARIANISM |
|
|
|
| Stephen Bates,
The Commission and Its Lessons |
3
|
2
|
141
|
| |
|
|
|
| Matthew D. Bunker,
First Amendment Theory and Conceptions of Self |
1
|
2
|
241
|
| |
|
|
|
| Donald M. Gillmor,
Who Was W.E. Hocking? |
3
|
2
|
231
|
| |
|
|
|
| Roy Leeper, Keegstra
and R.A.V.: A Comparative Analysis of the Canadian
and U.S. Approaches to Hate Speech Legislation |
5
|
3
|
295
|
|
