|
Author &
Title
|
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FAIR
TRIAL - FREE PRESS |
|
|
|
|
| William J. Brown et. al., Media
Coverage and Public Opinion of the O.J. Simpson Trial:
Implications for the Criminal Justice System |
2
|
2
|
261
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Sandra F. Chance and Susan D.
Ross, Gag Orders: Shields or Swords in the Constitutional
Conflict Between Fair Trial and Free Press? |
1
|
2
|
271
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| R. Michael Hoefges, Prosecuting
the Press: First Amendment Balancing and State Statutues
That Punish Publication of Information of Crimes and Official
Misconduct |
2
|
2
|
213
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Marla Sandys and Steven M. Chermak,
A Journey in the Unknown: Pretrial Publicity and Capital
Cases |
1
|
4
|
533
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Ronald D. Rotunda, Reporting
Sensational Trials: Free Press, a Responsible Press and
Cameras in the Courts |
3
|
2
|
295
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| John W. Wright II and Susan
Dente Ross, Trial by Media? Media Reliance, Knowledge
of Crime and Perception of Criminal Defendants |
2
|
4
|
397
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| FAIR-USE
DEFENSE |
|
|
|
|
| Andrew R. Bechtel and Arati
R. Korwar, Copyright and the Creative Use of Visual Artworks
in the 1990s |
4
|
4
|
431
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| M. Joseph Hinshaw, The Role
of Standardization and Interoperability in Copyright Protection
of Computer Software |
4
|
3
|
299
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Matt Jackson, The Digital Millennium
Copyright Act of 1998: A Proposed Amendment to Accommodate
Free Speech |
5
|
1
|
61
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION |
|
|
|
|
| Dale Kunkel and Ursula Goette,
Broadcasters' Response to the Children's Television Act |
2
|
3
|
289
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Philip M. Napoli, The Federal
Communications Commission and Broadcast Policy-Making
--1966-95: A Logistic Regression Analysis of Interest
Group Influence |
5
|
2
|
203
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland, Jr., The
Meaning of "The Public Interest" in Communications
Policy, Part I: Its Origins in State and Federal Regulation |
2
|
3
|
309
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| William D. Rowland, Jr., The
Meaning of "The Public Interest" in Communications
Policy, Part II: Its Implementation in Early Broadcast
Law and Regulation |
2
|
4
|
363
|
|
|
| Author
& Title |
Vol.
|
No.
|
Page
|
| |
|
|
|
| FEMINIST
THEORY |
|
|
|
| Diane L. Borden, Patterns of
Harm: An Analysis of Gender and Defamation |
2
|
1
|
105
|
| |
|
|
|
| Matthew D. Bunker, First Amendment
Theory and Conceptions of the Self |
1
|
2
|
241
|
| |
|
|
|
| Matthew D. Bunker, Imperial
Paradigms: First Amendment Theory, Legal Interdisciplinarity
and Reductionism |
3
|
4
|
515
|
| |
|
|
|
| Sandra Davidson, Age Spots:
Gender Sensitivity and the Hutchins Commisssion |
3
|
2
|
247
|
| |
|
|
|
| Jack Glascock, Regina v.
Butler: The Harms of Approach and Freedom of Expression |
1
|
1
|
117
|
| |
|
|
|
| FIFTH
AMENDMENT |
|
|
|
| Patricia Bastian, Constitutional
Considerations of the Escrowed Encryption Standard |
1
|
1
|
43
|
| |
|
|
|
| FILM |
|
|
|
| Andrew R. Bechtel and Arati
R. Korwar, Copyright and the Creative Use of Visual Artworks
in the 1990s |
4
|
4
|
431
|
| |
|
|
|
| FILTERING |
|
|
|
| Jan H. Samoriski, Private Spaces
and Public Interests: Internet Navigation, Commercialism
and the Fleecing of Democracy |
5
|
1
|
93
|
| |
|
|
|
| Barbara H. Smith, To Filter
or Not to Filter: The Role of the Public Library in Determining
Internet Access |
5
|
3
|
385
|
|
